Assess
Architecture, codebase, delivery practice and running costs reviewed against where the business is going. You get a ranked findings register, not a maturity score.

Architecture that holds when the load and the auditor arrive.
Technology decisions are expensive to reverse. A platform chosen badly, an integration built as a one-off, a modernisation that migrated the mess — these do not show up as incidents. They show up as a delivery team that gets slower every quarter.
Our technology and solution consulting practice makes those decisions properly and then delivers against them. Enterprise and solution architecture, cloud strategy and migration, legacy modernisation, systems integration and API design, platform engineering and DevSecOps — with security, data residency and auditability designed in from the first diagram rather than retrofitted before a certification audit.
We are practitioners. Everything we recommend, we have built and operated ourselves across our own SaaS portfolio — identity, encrypted storage, signing, monitoring and transactional email running under one compliance standard.
Reference architectures, domain and integration models, technology standards and architecture governance that a delivery team will actually use.
Landing zones, migration waves, right-sizing and FinOps across Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud — with UK region and data-residency requirements set as constraints, not preferences.
Strangler-fig decomposition, re-platforming and rewrite decisions taken on evidence, with data migration and cutover planned to be reversible.
API design and governance, event-driven and integration patterns, identity federation and third-party connectivity — documented, versioned and testable.
CI/CD, infrastructure as code, secrets management, SBOM and dependency scanning, observability and change control that produces its own audit evidence.
Independent assessment of a codebase, architecture, team and delivery practice for investment, acquisition or board assurance — findings ranked by cost to fix.
Architecture, codebase, delivery practice and running costs reviewed against where the business is going. You get a ranked findings register, not a maturity score.
Target architecture, technology selection and a migration or build sequence — with the non-functional requirements written first: security, residency, resilience, cost.
Delivery in short increments with your team alongside ours, automated pipelines from day one, and evidence produced as a by-product of the process.
Observability, runbooks, incident response and a handover that leaves your people able to run and change the system without us.
Not on the list? The constraint we design to is regulatory exposure, not sector — talk to us about yours.
Yes. We start with a technical assessment so both sides agree on the state of the code and the risks before anyone commits to a plan.
Yes. UK data residency is a default we design to across our own products, and we treat it as a hard architectural constraint on client work — including backups, logs, telemetry and any third-party processor.
No. We build on mainstream, portable technology, write the documentation, and hand over infrastructure as code and pipelines your team owns. The measure of a good engagement is that you can leave.
Yes — independent architecture, code, security and team assessments for investment, acquisition or board assurance, delivered to a fixed timeline.
Artificial intelligence you can put in front of a regulator.
Oracle and SAP programmes delivered with the controls already in place.
Audits led by a certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor — findings you can act on, evidence you can show.
Encrypted document storage with keys that stay on UK soil.
Status and uptime monitoring with an audit trail you can show a regulator.
Transactional email with deliverability and a full compliance trail.
Ready when you are
Thirty focused minutes. Tell us the problem and the constraints, and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right people for it.